WhitmanTrading

What Is the Force Index?

Force index multiplies the change in closing price by the period's volume, producing a single figure intended to show the strength behind a move. The raw output is extremely noisy, so it is almost always smoothed with a moving average before being read.

The force index combines price movement and volume into one number. The premise is reasonable and the output requires more handling than most indicators before it says anything.

How it works

A price series with volume combined into one measure.
The force index multiplies price change by volume. Illustrative chart - not real market data.

Take the change in closing price from one period to the next and multiply it by that period’s volume.

A steady series where participation is measured.
Asks whether a move had participation. Illustrative chart - not real market data.

The sign follows the price. A rising close gives a positive value; a falling one gives a negative value, and the magnitude scales with both the move and the volume.

A rising series with a large positive reading.
Positive when price rose, negative when it fell. Illustrative chart - not real market data.

A large move on heavy volume produces a large reading. The same move on light volume produces a small one, which is the distinction the indicator exists to draw.

A falling series where the raw output is erratic.
The raw version is far too noisy to read. Illustrative chart - not real market data.

Why smoothing is not optional

A choppy series where a smoothed version is readable.
So it is smoothed, usually over 2 or 13 periods. Illustrative chart - not real market data.

The raw series swings wildly. Volume varies enormously between periods and price changes flip sign constantly, so the product jumps around with no usable pattern.

A slow series where a long average reveals a trend.
And different again over a long horizon. Illustrative chart - not real market data.

A short average — two periods is conventional — makes it readable for short-term entries while keeping it responsive.

A calm series with small readings throughout.
A quiet stretch hides what it measures. Illustrative chart - not real market data.

A longer average — thirteen periods is the common choice — shows the trend in participation rather than individual periods, and the two lengths answer different questions.

A worked example

Take this site’s shared series. The median bar range is 0.493, so a typical period’s price change is modest.

Multiply that by volume and the result has no natural scale. A force index value means nothing in isolation — it depends on the instrument’s price level and its typical volume.

A falling series with a stop level marked.
A stop fills where the market is. Illustrative chart - not real market data.

So readings are compared to the indicator’s own history, not to a threshold. There is no overbought level here in the way there is for a bounded oscillator.

Which is the main practical difference from an indicator like RSI. It has no fixed range, so every interpretation is relative to what this instrument has recently produced.

What people actually look for

A cross of zero on the smoothed line. Participation shifting from net selling to net buying, or the reverse, which is the simplest reading.

Divergence. Price making a new high while the force index does not, suggesting the move happened on less participation than the previous one.

And extremes relative to recent history. An unusually large reading marks a period where a great deal of volume moved price, which often coincides with capitulation or a breakout.

None of those is a signal on its own. The indicator is a description of what already happened — participation is observable only after the fact — and the divergences that look compelling in hindsight are frequent and often resolve by the price simply continuing.

The original data

On this site’s shared series: median bar range 0.493, ninetieth percentile 1.101, largest bar 2.338. Direction runs average 2.01 bars with a longest of 11.

Those run figures constrain what any such indicator can do. With direction changing every two bars on average, a smoothed measure of participation is describing a pattern that rarely persists long enough to act on.

A candlestick chart annotated with the cost of a round trip.
A round trip costs a share of a bar. Illustrative chart - not real market data.

And each act costs 0.0098, about 2% of the median bar range. An indicator generating frequent signals against a two-bar average run is paying that cost repeatedly for moves that may not be there.

A price series with volume shown beneath.
Volume and price measure different things. Illustrative chart - not real market data.

What volume does and does not tell you

Volume is a count of transactions, not of conviction. Every trade has a buyer and a seller, so high volume means disagreement was resolved at that price rather than that one side was stronger.

Which undercuts the usual language. “Buying pressure” describes a price that rose, and the volume attached tells you how many shares changed hands while it did — not that buyers outnumbered sellers, since by construction they cannot.

The defensible reading is narrower. A large price move on heavy volume means a lot of ownership changed at the new price, which makes that price more established than one reached on almost no trading.

And that is genuinely useful. It is a smaller claim than most volume indicators are described as making, and it is the part that survives examination.

Where it sits among volume indicators

On-balance volume adds or subtracts the whole period’s volume based on the direction of the close, ignoring the size of the move entirely.

Accumulation-distribution weights volume by where the close sits within the period’s range, which responds to the shape of the bar rather than the change between bars.

Money flow index bounds the same idea between zero and a hundred, which makes it readable against fixed levels in a way this indicator is not.

All of them combine the same two inputs differently, and their signals agree far more often than the differences between them would suggest — which is worth knowing before adding several to one chart and mistaking agreement for confirmation.

When it fails

The characteristic failure is reading divergence as a reversal signal. Price makes a new high, the force index makes a lower one, and the interpretation is that the move lacks support and will turn. It frequently does not — a trend can continue for a long time on declining participation, because the people who wanted to sell have already sold and it takes very little buying to keep lifting a thin market. Divergence identifies a condition that is present before some reversals and also present through long stretches of continuation, with nothing in the indicator distinguishing them.

A candlestick series with a gap through a level.
A gap skips the level entirely. Illustrative chart - not real market data.

A second failure is comparing readings across instruments, where price levels and volumes differ so the scale is meaningless.

A third is using the raw unsmoothed series, which is noise.

A fourth is treating volume as a measure of intent, when every trade has two sides.

A declining series cut short at a decision point.
New high, weaker force index. Reversal? Illustrative chart - not real market data.

And a fifth is optimising the smoothing length on past data, which fits the indicator to a period rather than testing it.

Volume analysis covers the wider practice this belongs to. Volume covers what is actually being counted. And market trend covers the direction this indicator is usually read alongside.

What I actually do

The idea behind this indicator is sound — a move on heavy volume is different from the same move on nothing. What it produces is a raw number with no natural scale, which is why every practical use of it involves smoothing and comparing it to itself rather than to any threshold.

— Michael Whitman

This page is educational, not financial advice. Test every idea on your own charts before risking money.