WhitmanTrading

How to Choose a Broker

Choosing a broker means comparing execution quality, available order types, margin terms and custody arrangements. Commission is the most visible difference and rarely the largest one, because the spread paid on every round trip is a bigger number and appears on no statement.

How it works

A candlestick chart of the site's shared price history. The headline on the chart reads: A broker is an execution service and a custodian.
A broker is an execution service and a custodian. Illustrative chart - not real market data.

A broker does two separate jobs and they are worth assessing separately. It routes your orders to somewhere they can be filled, and it holds your money and securities. A firm can be good at one and mediocre at the other.

Most comparisons cover neither. They compare commission, platform screenshots and the number of available instruments, which are the three easiest things to tabulate and among the least consequential.

A candlestick chart of the site's shared price history, annotated with the round-trip cost. The headline on the chart reads: The cost you can measure is 2% of a typical bar.
The cost you can measure is 2% of a typical bar. Illustrative chart - not real market data.

The cost that dominates is the one with no line item. On the site’s shared history a round trip costs 2% of a typical bar’s range, paid as spread on the way in and again on the way out, and it appears on no statement anywhere.

What to compare instead of commission

A flat, quiet stretch of the long price series, with the bid and the ask drawn as horizontal lines. The headline on the chart reads: Commission is the smaller half; the spread is the other.
Commission is the smaller half; the spread is the other. Illustrative chart - not real market data.

Execution quality is measurable and published. Venues and brokers publish execution statistics, and brokers publish where they route orders, which is the subject of the payment for order flow page. Those documents are dull and specific, which is what makes them useful.

A strongly rising stretch of the long price series, with filled limit orders marked in green and missed ones in red. The headline on the chart reads: And fill quality shows up as orders that never filled.
And fill quality shows up as orders that never filled. Illustrative chart - not real market data.

Fill quality shows up in two places. The price you got against the quote at the time, and the orders that did not fill at all. Both are visible in your own records if you keep them, and neither appears in any advertisement.

A 72-bar candlestick section of the shared price history. The headline on the chart reads: Which order types are supported decides what you can do.
Which order types are supported decides what you can do. Illustrative chart - not real market data.

Supported order types set the boundary of what you can run. Bracket orders, trailing stops, stop-limits, one-cancels-other, and whether any of them work outside regular hours — the order types page covers what each does, and a broker that lacks the one your method needs is unusable at any price.

A gently rising stretch of the long price series, with the session boundaries marked. The headline on the chart reads: So does whether they let you trade outside the session.
So does whether they let you trade outside the session. Illustrative chart - not real market data.

Extended-hours access varies, and so do the hours offered. Two brokers can both advertise premarket trading and open two hours apart.

A calmly advancing stretch of the long price series, with the entry price and the margin-call level drawn as horizontal lines. The headline on the chart reads: Margin rates and house requirements are not industry standard.
Margin rates and house requirements are not industry standard. Illustrative chart - not real market data.

Margin terms differ more than most people expect. Interest rates vary widely, and so do house maintenance requirements — the margin account page covers why a house requirement above the regulatory floor changes where the call sits.

In practice: the questions worth asking

What happens on a bad day is the question no table answers. Platform outages cluster on high volatility, which is exactly when the ability to close a position matters, and one such day can cost more than several years of commission.

Who holds the money is the second. Custody arrangements and the investor protection scheme covering the account are separate from execution and generally more consequential if anything goes wrong.

A long-horizon candlestick view of the same price series. The headline on the chart reads: Custody and investor protection are separate questions.
Custody and investor protection are separate questions. Illustrative chart - not real market data.

Third, what it costs to leave. Account transfer fees, whether positions transfer in kind, and how long it takes are all knowable in advance and rarely checked until they matter.

Fourth, what the data actually is. A free real-time feed for one exchange and delayed data elsewhere is common, and a strategy built on a feed you do not have is not a strategy.

A declining stretch of the long price series. The headline on the chart reads: And whether their platform works on the day it matters.
And whether their platform works on the day it matters. Illustrative chart - not real market data.

What a broker comparison is not

It is not a ranking. The right broker depends on what you trade, how often, in what size and from where, and a list ordered by commission answers none of those.

It is not permanent. Terms, requirements and platforms change, sometimes on positions you already hold, so the decision is worth revisiting rather than making once.

It is not settled by a bonus. Account-opening incentives are one-off and the cost structure is recurring, which is the wrong way round for a decision measured in years.

And it is not a proxy for safety. A well-known name is not itself evidence about custody, and the specific protections applying to your account are a question with a documented answer.

When it fails

A sideways, range-bound candlestick series. The headline on the chart reads: The cheapest broker is not the one with no commission.
The cheapest broker is not the one with no commission. Illustrative chart - not real market data.

The characteristic mistake is optimising the visible number. Zero commission removed the line item and not the cost, and a wider effective spread on every trade is a larger annual sum than the commission it replaced for most active accounts.

The second is choosing on features you will not use. A long instrument list matters only if you trade those instruments, and it frequently comes with a worse experience in the ones you do.

The third is discovering a restriction after committing. Order types, extended hours, short availability and margin treatment are all checkable before opening an account and awkward to discover afterwards.

And the fourth is running everything through one firm. A single point of failure for execution and custody is a concentration most traders would not accept anywhere else in their finances.

A second account at a second firm is the cheapest insurance available here. It costs nothing to hold open, it gives you somewhere to close a position from when a platform is down, and it makes the transfer question concrete rather than theoretical. Most people discover they need one on the day it is too late to open it.

The order to evaluate these in is roughly the reverse of how they are advertised. Custody and platform reliability first, because failures there are unrecoverable. Then order types and market access, because they decide whether your method runs at all. Then margin and data terms. Commission last, because it is the smallest number in the list and the only one anybody markets on.

The original data

Only 3 of the 24,971 videos measured for this site cover choosing a broker, at a median of 11,508 views. That is a very small supply against a high median — the pattern that usually means the question is being asked far more often than it is being answered.

A candlestick chart of the site's shared price history, cut short at the decision bar. The headline on the chart reads: Zero commission, wider fills. Which account do you open?
Zero commission, wider fills. Which account do you open? Illustrative chart - not real market data.

The comparison this site can make concretely is the cost one. A round trip costs 2% of a typical bar’s range in spread on the shared history. Set any commission schedule against that number, in the size you actually trade, and the ranking usually changes.

Payment for order flow explains where zero-commission revenue comes from. The bid-ask spread is the cost that survives it. And order types is the capability list worth checking before opening anything.

What I actually do

I have changed broker twice and both times it was about something that never appears in a comparison table: once because the platform went down on a day I needed it, and once because a house margin requirement changed without warning on a position I was already holding.

— Michael Whitman

This page is educational, not financial advice. Test every idea on your own charts before risking money.